Dominion-Fox defamation settlement – Latest in string of multi-million dollar US claimant victories

Dominion-Fox defamation settlement – Latest in string of multi-million dollar US claimant victories

A rise in successful high profile defamation and privacy cases in the US is of note, as juries move to awarding huge sums in damages.

The latest mammoth US$787m settlement by Fox, of a defamation claim brought by Dominion Voting Systems, is the latest in a series of victorious “media law” claims, in a jurisdiction where commentators sometimes overstate the protection of the 1st amendment when meritorious claims are brought.

The Dominion/Fox case caps 18 months of high-profile successes for defamation and privacy claimants, including:

  • Depp v Heard, 2022, Defamation
    A jury at the Virginia Circuit Court awarded Mr Depp US$10.35m for 3 counts of Defamation, and Ms Heard US$2m for 1 count of Defamation.

  • Various Claimants v Alex Jones, 2022, Defamation
    A Connecticut court awarded a combined US$1.4 billion in a Connecticut court, (split between various parents of children murdered at Sandy Hook School, against the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.) A further US$50m was awarded by a Texas Jury over a similar claim.

  • Bryant & Chester v LA County 2022, Privacy
    A jury returned a US$31m verdict against LA County after deputies and firefighters took and shared photographs of famed Basketball player Kobe Bryant’s death scene.

The Dominion/Fox proceedings have highlighted the different approaches taken in the USA and UK to defamation claims, and there is no doubt that the bar to a successful claim in the USA remains higher. However the very substantial damages and punitive damages awards in the USA remain attractive to Claimants with strong cases, and contrast with the relatively low level of damages awarded in UK courts, where the issue of vindication is often the primary motivation.

US proceedings also allow for early and extensive disclosure opportunities, a fact highly material in the Dominion case, after internal messages between Fox presenters and executives were disclosed and proved damaging to their defence, and reputation.

(Attorneys in the above cases: Susman Godfrey, Clare Locke, & Farnan for Dominion; Brown Rudnick for Mr Depp; Koskoff (and others) for The Sandy Hook Families: Wilson Sonsini for Bryant)

Recent posts

Previous
Next
Unable to row the distance: No copyright in a rowing machine as a work of artistic craftsmanship (WaterRower v Liking)
Read more
The wait is over – Sky v SkyKick decision handed down today
Read more
Autumn Budget 2024: Headlines
Read more
The Final Word
Read more
The UK's new Data (Use and Access) Bill has been introduced into Parliament
Read more
New reforms but a long wait for change: government publishes Employment Rights Bill draft
Read more
The UK's Data Protection Regulator begins its modernisation plans
Read more
A cautionary tale of lessons learnt in cases involving crypto fraud from D'Aloia v Persons Unknown Category A & Ors [2024]
Read more
‘This is a true story’: A lesson learnt from ‘Baby Reindeer’ for shows dramatising the lives of real people
Read more
Tougher protection on its way for victims of revenge porn
Read more

More from this author

Previous
Next
PSNI and Electoral Commission breaches show no one is immune from the worst case scenario
Read more

Share this page